Latest Tweets:

*5

Your Lies Ruin Lives

Anonymous said: I'm disabled and need a lot of assistance. Three years ago I needed twice as much because my illness had gotten so bad I was unable to move my own muscles. I am TIRED of being anti choice people's go to example of compassion or whatever.

*4

Your Lies Ruin Lives

Anonymous said: OH NO I CAN'T HANDLE THAT SOMEONE HAS THE FREEDOM TO EXPRESS THEIR RELIGION STAY THE FUCK AWAY FROM ME YOU DISGUSTING MONGREL I DON'T HAVE A SHRED OF HUMANITY -that last anon

*15

Your Lies Ruin Lives

Anonymous said: Please don't touch my blog if you're going to have stars of david everywhere. That's disgusting.

image

Your Lies Ruin Lives

Anonymous said: If consent to an action is consent to the consequences, then allowing a person into your house, and having that person decide to murder you suddenly a consensual act. Consenting to surgery and having the doctor just take a kidney is consensual because hey, you knew that was a possibility. No suing the doc. Going for a walk and being run over by a semi is consensual, because hey, if you stayed in your house it wouldn't happen. So no help for you! You knew it could happen. Deal with it.

allyourlovingandlonging:

comradebutterfly:

allyourlovingandlonging:

comradebutterfly:

allyourlovingandlonging:

comradebutterfly:

allyourlovingandlonging:

comradebutterfly:

allyourlovingandlonging:

comradebutterfly:

the only biological purpose for sex is pregnancy. your baby isn’t trying to kill you, calm down.

1. Don’t fucking tell people to calm down when talking about their bodily rights, which are being taken away. 
2. Yes, your fetus isn’t trying to kill you….because a fetus can’t think or feel or have agendas. There are countless ways that fetuses/pregnancy/childbirth can be fatal though to the pregnant person though. 
3. People aren’t INCUBATORS that only exist to procreate, and your mindset that we are is disgusting. Not to mention the fact that women (and perhaps men, I haven’t checked) have organs/parts of their genitals that’s only functions are to provide pleasure. So, sorry, but you’re wrong.

Fetuses are people too. Most women don’t get abortions for ‘health’, they get them because it enables them to continue being sluts.

Lol except they’re not? Fetuses aren’t “people” until they’re born. And wooooowwwwww yup I’m totally not surprised you’re throwing out misogynistic slurs, you don’t seem to have much of a counter argument so I guess that’s the only thing you have left to say. Fuck off and stop judging what people do with their bodies.

Ok, prove to me that they’re not people. They look like people, they grow like people, they come from two human parents and they have people DNA. (They are people.)

Stop judging people? If someone wants to abort their own body, I don’t give a fuck. But women don’t abort themselves, do they?

They’re human and they’re alive but they’re not people. They’re not sentient or autonomous, so they’re not a person, it’s just common sense…..? Plus, about 98% of abortions are performed before they “look like humans”, but it doesn’t even matter. A pregnant person’s bodily autonomy will always trump a fetuses’ right to life.

Um yeah, stop judging people. Stop judging people about what they do with their own fucking bodies. Not your uterus, not your opinion.

Do you think anyone cares if they are “sentient” or not? Yeah, the baby has no choice in the matter; it’s quite hypocritical.

Boo hoo, the non-sentient fetuses who don’t even know they exist don’t have a choice in the matter.

Boo, hoo, the woman has a belly for a few months so the other human has decades of life.

Um I think what you meant was NINE MONTHS. Not a “few months.” Nine months of debilitating morning sickness, body aches, migraines, diarrhea, high blood pressure, and a plethora of other horrible side effects. Not to mention the countless fatal side effects of pregnancy or childbirth. And let’s also not forget the literal thousands of dollars in doctors bills it takes just to care for oneself during a pregnancy. Oh, and that in the US, employers aren’t required to give maternity leave, or that many people are forced to quit their jobs because of their pregnancy-there are so many people who literally can’t afford pregnancy. You don’t give a shit about the people who suffer because of pregnancy or who are forced to get an abortion because of their living/financial situations, you just care about unfeeling fetuses and judging people. Don’t you dare try to downplay pregnancy so you can shame people who don’t want to go through it.

*10

Your Lies Ruin Lives

Anonymous said: IMO having a D answer like that would be really redundant, because it's already covered by B and C. Those both already say you support the right to abortion in at least some circumstances, and don't inherently mean that you yourself would get one. Plus, the thinking that "I would NEVER get an abortion" is kind of flimsy IMO because it's easy to say that when you're not pregnant. Even adamant lifers have gotten abortions when they found themselves pregnant at a bad time.

culture-of-choice:

Yup. This is a very good point.

Remember, “The only acceptable abortion is my abortion.” Very sad.

You know what’s even sadder? The pro-lifers who get an abortion, and stay pro-life.

They really do exist. It just makes no sense. Talk about the height of hypocrisy.

Your Lies Ruin Lives

Anonymous said: If consent to an action is consent to the consequences, then allowing a person into your house, and having that person decide to murder you suddenly a consensual act. Consenting to surgery and having the doctor just take a kidney is consensual because hey, you knew that was a possibility. No suing the doc. Going for a walk and being run over by a semi is consensual, because hey, if you stayed in your house it wouldn't happen. So no help for you! You knew it could happen. Deal with it.

unamericanpsycho:

comradebutterfly:

allyourlovingandlonging:

comradebutterfly:

allyourlovingandlonging:

comradebutterfly:

allyourlovingandlonging:

comradebutterfly:

allyourlovingandlonging:

comradebutterfly:

the only biological purpose for sex is pregnancy. your baby isn’t trying to kill you, calm down.

1. Don’t fucking tell people to calm down when talking about their bodily rights, which are being taken away. 
2. Yes, your fetus isn’t trying to kill you….because a fetus can’t think or feel or have agendas. There are countless ways that fetuses/pregnancy/childbirth can be fatal though to the pregnant person though. 
3. People aren’t INCUBATORS that only exist to procreate, and your mindset that we are is disgusting. Not to mention the fact that women (and perhaps men, I haven’t checked) have organs/parts of their genitals that’s only functions are to provide pleasure. So, sorry, but you’re wrong.

Fetuses are people too. Most women don’t get abortions for ‘health’, they get them because it enables them to continue being sluts.

Lol except they’re not? Fetuses aren’t “people” until they’re born. And wooooowwwwww yup I’m totally not surprised you’re throwing out misogynistic slurs, you don’t seem to have much of a counter argument so I guess that’s the only thing you have left to say. Fuck off and stop judging what people do with their bodies.

Ok, prove to me that they’re not people. They look like people, they grow like people, they come from two human parents and they have people DNA. (They are people.)

Stop judging people? If someone wants to abort their own body, I don’t give a fuck. But women don’t abort themselves, do they?

They’re human and they’re alive but they’re not people. They’re not sentient or autonomous, so they’re not a person, it’s just common sense…..? Plus, about 98% of abortions are performed before they “look like humans”, but it doesn’t even matter. A pregnant person’s bodily autonomy will always trump a fetuses’ right to life.

Um yeah, stop judging people. Stop judging people about what they do with their own fucking bodies. Not your uterus, not your opinion.

Do you think anyone cares if they are “sentient” or not? Yeah, the baby has no choice in the matter; it’s quite hypocritical.

Boo hoo, the non-sentient fetuses who don’t even know they exist don’t have a choice in the matter.

Boo, hoo, the woman has a belly for a few months so the other human has decades of life.

>They’re not sentient or autonomous
That’s it you guys, you heard it here, if you’re in a coma, you are not a person, therefore, we WILL put you in a dumpster if you go into a coma.

A belly, and potentially life threatening side effects if not outright death. 650 pregnant people die in child birth or from complications tied to pregnancy a year in America alone. So if someone isn’t 100% behind keeping something within them, they should not be forced to. 

And people in comas are people. They’re born. They’re not living within someone’s body. Staff is paid to care for them. If someone doesn’t want to care for someone comatose anymore, they put in their notice and another staff member can step in. And before you say anything more ableist, let me point out that long term, severely disabled people are also still people because even if their family is caring for them, they are still autonomous. They aren’t living within someone’s body. 

I don’t think you understand that a fetus gestates within an internal organ in someone. They are literally camped out in someone’s body. That taxes a perfectly healthy body of someone who planned their pregnancy. Part of health is positive outlook and mental peace with what’s happening/going to happen. If someone is forced into keeping a pregnancy, they will not have a good outcome. 

*6

Your Lies Ruin Lives

Anonymous said: Thank you for putting the liar in their place (the one about how "high" their IQ is). It gave me a much needed laugh. Keep putting liars in their place!

Forever and always. :D 

Your Lies Ruin Lives

Anonymous said: Oh my Gawd. Can't CD just admit he lied about his IQ? This is just sad.

No.. apparently he can’t. But it’s whatever, I guess. Whatever makes him feel better about himself? 

*8

Your Lies Ruin Lives

Anonymous said: Did carolinadipshit actually get threatened?

No idea, to be honest. I am not sure. People shouldn’t get threatened, though. So if anyone IS threatening him, even if he’s a douche, please to be stopping. 

oh-snap-pro-choice:

right-of-life:

right-of-life:

So where’s the science?

right-of-life:

It is absolutely laughable to me that pro choicers feel they have science on their side. After much research, I have found that there is no definition of what is and what is not alive, since life is so diverse. However, from…

(I run this blog from mobile, so if you could show me how to do that I certainly will. Thanks!)

I suggest you review the International Declaration of Human Rights. (http://www.ohchr.org/en/issues/pages/whatarehumanrights.aspx) and tell me where it proves me wrong. With everything I have read, and what you have stated, it is clear that the unborn deserve these rights.

No where in that link did it says humans have the right to use another’s body.

The UN also says that denying people safe abortion access is a form of torture.

"Moreover, the report highlights the importance of eliminating government bureaucracy in women’s health care – particularly with regards to rape survivors seeking abortion care. Throwing in boulders in the way of women’s access to health care serves no legitimate purpose but to humiliate and hinder the rights of women to obtain a basic right. Even allowing abortion only in the case of rape or incest puts the burden on a woman to prove that she was a victim of such a trauma. Doing such only strains government resources, and more importantly, severely inconveniences women seeking care by forcing them to jump through hoops in pursuit of a simple medical procedure." (X) -Kendra

Your Lies Ruin Lives

Anonymous said: Animals self aborting is not liberal bias lmao did you go to school, or did your genius IQ prevent you from learning that somehow

carolinadipper:

your-lies-ruin-lives:

carolinadipper:

your-lies-ruin-lives:

carolinadipper:

your-lies-ruin-lives:

carolinadipper:

Everything you “fact check” you only come up with liberal sources, and anything to the contrary somehow isn’t valid to the argument. But I don’t expect much out of liberals, y’all are sheep after all

Let’s see. Here’s an article about the smartest people on earth. :D 


Only two are in America.. and they’re both in their 50s. And I’ve found 3 people with IQs of 170 in articles.. and they’re 12, 14, and a 16 year olds. 

Funny. I can’t find a single thing about a 20something year old 170 IQ genius living in Georgia or either of the Carolinas. 

As you see, if your claims were valid, there’d be an article that could be found about you, name or not. All you’d have to do is google “People with IQs over 160” and you’d get an outpouring of results and one of them would have a 20something year old living in the locations listed for you or your girlfriend. 

It’s harder to pass off a fake claim like yours than it is to debunk it. Curses Google.. amirite? 

;) Nice try though. 


You realize my location and age are personal identifiers right? Idiot

You realize you have a picture as your avatar and you are obviously not 12-15 … or in your 50s right? You still do not fit the age requirements of Americans listed with that IQ? :P 

Again, my age wouldn’t be listed as it’s my personal right to not have it listed! You’re retarded

Oh.. right. I forgot. You’re a prolifer. In Prolifelandia, the laws of logic and typicality aren’t applicable to you. Go on, little special snowflake. Perpetrate your lies to your followers who are too ignorant to know how to use common sense and search engines! 

Again I have a right to not have my personal information published in any form, as y’all have said

No see.. you aren’t getting it. You really do not understand. If you have an IQ over that of Hawking and Einstein, articles get written and published about you whether you want them to or not because they are so astoundingly rare. 

You don’t get to special snowflake opt out because it is THAT RARE that that happens. So you could have said you had an IQ of 145-150 and it would’ve been more viable and reasonable without any verification possible. Those are still above average IQs but don’t warrant publication unless it’s of someone with accompanying mental illness or some other disability and then it’s just to tout the virtue of “YOU CAN DO ANYTHING!” 

170 is so high that it would be published. There is no way you could have a higher IQ than that of the people on the list I linked you and be unreported. 

I’m telling you lied badly since there is no possible way that that could be the case. EVERYONE with IQs that high gets an article about them. There’d be news article or a story about it. Because it is that rare. You should’ve stuck to still above average but reasonably low enough that you wouldn’t have gotten an article written. ;) 

"You will always wonder what your baby looked like."

Anti talking to a client as we walked to the clinic.  Thank goodness they didn’t speak english well.

No wonder people feel guilt and remorse.  Anti’s cause it.

(via shitantichoiceprotesterssay)

Your Lies Ruin Lives

Anonymous said: Animals self aborting is not liberal bias lmao did you go to school, or did your genius IQ prevent you from learning that somehow

carolinadipper:

your-lies-ruin-lives:

carolinadipper:

your-lies-ruin-lives:

carolinadipper:

Everything you “fact check” you only come up with liberal sources, and anything to the contrary somehow isn’t valid to the argument. But I don’t expect much out of liberals, y’all are sheep after all

Let’s see. Here’s an article about the smartest people on earth. :D 


Only two are in America.. and they’re both in their 50s. And I’ve found 3 people with IQs of 170 in articles.. and they’re 12, 14, and a 16 year olds. 

Funny. I can’t find a single thing about a 20something year old 170 IQ genius living in Georgia or either of the Carolinas. 

As you see, if your claims were valid, there’d be an article that could be found about you, name or not. All you’d have to do is google “People with IQs over 160” and you’d get an outpouring of results and one of them would have a 20something year old living in the locations listed for you or your girlfriend. 

It’s harder to pass off a fake claim like yours than it is to debunk it. Curses Google.. amirite? 

;) Nice try though. 


You realize my location and age are personal identifiers right? Idiot

You realize you have a picture as your avatar and you are obviously not 12-15 … or in your 50s right? You still do not fit the age requirements of Americans listed with that IQ? :P 

Again, my age wouldn’t be listed as it’s my personal right to not have it listed! You’re retarded

Oh.. right. I forgot. You’re a prolifer. In Prolifelandia, the laws of logic and typicality aren’t applicable to you. Go on, little special snowflake. Perpetrate your lies to your followers who are too ignorant to know how to use common sense and search engines! 

Your Lies Ruin Lives

Anonymous said: Animals self aborting is not liberal bias lmao did you go to school, or did your genius IQ prevent you from learning that somehow

carolinadipper:

your-lies-ruin-lives:

carolinadipper:

Everything you “fact check” you only come up with liberal sources, and anything to the contrary somehow isn’t valid to the argument. But I don’t expect much out of liberals, y’all are sheep after all

Let’s see. Here’s an article about the smartest people on earth. :D 


Only two are in America.. and they’re both in their 50s. And I’ve found 3 people with IQs of 170 in articles.. and they’re 12, 14, and a 16 year olds. 

Funny. I can’t find a single thing about a 20something year old 170 IQ genius living in Georgia or either of the Carolinas. 

As you see, if your claims were valid, there’d be an article that could be found about you, name or not. All you’d have to do is google “People with IQs over 160” and you’d get an outpouring of results and one of them would have a 20something year old living in the locations listed for you or your girlfriend. 

It’s harder to pass off a fake claim like yours than it is to debunk it. Curses Google.. amirite? 

;) Nice try though. 


You realize my location and age are personal identifiers right? Idiot

You realize you have a picture as your avatar and you are obviously not 12-15 … or in your 50s right? You still do not fit the age requirements of Americans listed with that IQ? :P 

*28

Your Lies Ruin Lives

Anonymous said: I've been told I will never have kids and it deeply offends me that anti choicers think I'm so selfish that I would want to force someone to go though a pregnancy they didn't want just so I could have a baby I personally want to adopt 5-10 year olds

Totally understood. This this this.